Prescription Advisory’s Vision & Values

Prescription Advisory's Vision and Values

Prescription Advisory’s Vision

Our vision is to become the gold standard for controlled substance safety and compliance.

Prescription Advisory’s Values

  • Protect patients first.
  • Obey the law.
  • Do all we can to help one another succeed.
  • Support diversity.
  • Balance work and home life.
  • Be very serious about our work, without being somber, stressed or agitated.

Prescription Advisory’s Mission

Prescription Advisory will build, operate, sell and support extraordinarily high-quality decision support tools for medical professionals who prescribe controlled substances.

Prescription Advisory’s Purpose

  • Allow prescribers to treat patients who need controlled substances, without fear of adverse consequences.
  • Help them get patients suffering from addiction into treatment.
  • Reduce the number of overdose injuries and deaths among their patients.

.

Whenever possible, orthopaedic surgeons should request and review old medical records and speak with the patient’s primary physician about past medication problems. Currently, states have Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs designed to assist law enforcement in the identification of doctor shoppers; these data are also accessible to physicians.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Now, March 2014

Follow Prescription Advisory

Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are now active in most states to assist clinicians in identifying potential controlled drug misuse, diversion, or excessive prescribing. Little is still known about the ways in which they are incorporated into workflow and clinical decision making, what barriers continue to exist, and how clinicians are sharing PDMP results with their patients.

Design
Qualitative data were collected through online focus groups and telephone interviews.

Setting
Clinicians from pain management, emergency and family medicine, psychiatry/behavioral health, rehabilitation medicine, internal medicine and dentistry participated.

Patients
Thirty-five clinicians from nine states participated.

Methods
We conducted two online focus groups and seven telephone interviews. A multidisciplinary team then used a grounded theory approach coupled with an immersion–crystallization strategy for identifying key themes in the resulting transcripts.

Results
Some participants, mainly from pain clinics, reported checking the PDMP with every patient, every time. Others checked only for new patients, for new opioid prescriptions, or for patients for whom they suspected abuse. Participants described varied approaches to sharing PDMP information with patients, including openly discussing potential addiction or safety concerns, avoiding discussion altogether, and approaching discussion confrontationally. Participants described patient anger or denial as a common response and noted the role of patient satisfaction surveys as an influence on prescribing.

Conclusion
Routines for accessing PDMP data and how clinicians respond to it vary widely. As PDMP use becomes more widespread, it will be important to understand what approaches are most effective for identifying and addressing unsafe medication use.

Pain Medicine, Volume 15, Issue 7, July 2014 
Prescription Advisory Systems & Technology

Request a PastRx Demo

We will contact you to arrange a demo at your convenience.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Prescription Advisory Systems & Technology

Contact PastRx

A representive will be in touch to answer any questions or concerns you might have.

Thank you! A Prescription Advisory representative will contact you shortly.

Share This